Youtube Ip Ban
Can’t Access the YouTube Website? Use YouTube IP Address!
Summary:Have you ever had a situation where you can’t access? It could be that your web host prevents you from accessing it. Therefore, using a URL based on an IP address may be helpful. If you want to get more details about YouTube IP address, read this post from Navigation:YouTube IP AddressYouTube IP Address RangeAcceptable Uses of YouTube IP AddressesFind the IP Addresses of YouTube UsersThis Doesn’t Always WorkBottom Line
Instead of using a normal DNS name, you can use a YouTube IP address to access the URL. Like many popular sites, YouTube also uses multiple servers to handle incoming requests. That means that the YouTube domain has multiple IP addresses available, depending on the time and location of the connection.
Further Reading: 2 Things You May Not Know about YouTube URL.
YouTube IP Address
If you want to get the IP address of YouTube, here are some of the most common.
208. 65. 153. 238
208. 251
208. 253
208. 117. 236. 69
Just as you can access the YouTube home page by entering in your web browser, you can also add to any YouTube IP address, such as YouTube IP Address Range
YouTube has a range of IP addresses called blocks to support a large and growing network of web servers and these IP address blocks belong to YouTube:
199. 223. 232. 0 – 199. 239. 255
207. 160. 0 – 207. 175. 255
208. 152. 0 – 208. 155. 224. 255. 255
209. 85. 128. 0 – 209. 255
216. 58. 192. 0 – 216. 32. 63. 255
If administrators’ router allows and they want to block access to YouTube from the network, they should block these IP address ranges.
You may be interested in this topic: How to Watch Blocked YouTube Videos – 4 Solutions.
Acceptable Uses of YouTube IP Addresses
If you can’t access, your web host may prevent you from accessing it. In this case, using a URL based on an IP address may be successful, but it violates your host network’s acceptable use policy (AUP). Before using an IP address to connect to YouTube, you need to check your AUP or contact your local network administrator.
Some countries have banned access to YouTube. Regardless of its name or IP address, the connections in these countries will fail. This is the main reason to use an HTTP proxy or VPN service.
For sites like YouTube, it can be difficult to ban individual users with the public IP address, because most Internet providers dynamically assign these IP addresses to customers. By the same token, YouTube does not strictly limit videos to one vote per IP address, although it does keep other restrictions in place to prevent vote stuffing.
Find the IP Addresses of YouTube Users
The IP addresses of users who vote on videos or comment on the site are recorded by YouTube. Like other large sites, YouTube could be required to share its server logs with legal authorities under a court order. However, as an ordinary user, you cannot access these private IP addresses.
This Doesn’t Always Work
Some IP addresses marked as belonging to YouTube point to another Google product, such as Google Search at This is because of shared hosting and Google uses some of the same servers to deliver its products, including YouTube.
Sometimes, the generic IP address used by Google products does not provide enough information to explain which web page you are trying to access, so you may not get any useful information and may see a blank page or some kind of error.
This concept applies to any web page. If you can’t open a web site with its IP address, the address might point to a server that hosts multiple web sites, so the server doesn’t know which web site to load based on your request.
Bottom Line
What is YouTube’s IP address? In this post, you can get some IP addresses for YouTube and a range of IP addresses of YouTube. If you can’t access YouTube with a normal DNS name, you can try to use a YouTube IP address to access the URL.
US court rules masking IP address to access blocked Website violates law
U. S. District Judge Charles Breyer in Northern District of California has ruled that avoiding an IP address block to connect to a Website is a breach of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA). Some have taken this decision to mean that the court’s broad interpretation of the law may mean accessing Websites that are accessible only to some users by proxy servers, virtual private networks (VPN)s, or Tor may be illegal.
According to the court, neither 3Taps nor Padmapper can use Craigslist’s data for their online maps of available apartments.
This decision arose from a case that all started because, unlike many other popular sites, Craigslist does not provide an application programming interface (API) for third party services to use its data. Indeed, in the summer of 2012, Craigslist briefly claimed the copyright over everything posted on Craigslist.
Craig Newmark, founder of Craigslist, who says that he’s merely a “customer support representative” for the company, told Ars Technica last year that “I can say that our culture has always been community-driven, and what they tell us, in large numbers and for years, [is] that their posts are not to be used by others for profit. ” One of Craiglist’s sources of income is charging for commercial apartment listings.
The case in question, Craigslist vs. 3Taps, revolved around a copyright infringement claim by Craigslist against data gathering company 3Taps. 3Taps had been scraping Craigslist rental apartment ads and then feeding the data via an API to the apartment listing company PadMapper. This business, in turn, used the data to create interactive maps using Google Maps for would-be renters. Craigslist claimed that this violated its terms of service (ToS).
So typical of a ToS legal disagreement, PadMapper and 3Taps came up with a workaround. Craigslist retaliated with a copyright claim against the two companies.
As is so often the case in circumstances like this, 3Taps countersued, claiming that Craigslist was trying to create a monopoly by squeezing out other would-be online classified advertising businesses.
Craigslist then blocked 3Taps Internet Protocol (IP) addresses from accessing its site. 3Taps continued, however, to pull Craigslist’s data by concealing its identity with different IP addresses and proxy servers. Craigslist then argued that the 3Taps’ subterfuge violated the CFAA which prohibits the intentional access of a computer without authorization that results in the capture of information from a protected computer.
Craiglist’s CFAA claim bothered many experts.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) in an amicus curiae to the Court stated that the CFAA had “been stretched to cover all sorts of non-hacking behavior. (PDF Link) This case perhaps represents the zenith of this trend: plaintiff Craigslist, Inc. (“Craigslist”) alleges defendant 3Taps Inc. (“3Taps”) violated the CFAA and Penal Code § 502 by copying data on Craigslist’s publicly available website and then republishing that information on its own website. Imposing CFAA liability under these circumstances means that it can now become criminal to copy and paste data from a publicly available website intended to be seen by as many people as possible on the Internet. A person using Craigslist to look for an apartment is authorized to write notes on a pen and paper, or manually plot apartment listings on a paper map. The same behavior should not be treated as criminal simply because it was done with a computer. ”
3Taps tried to have this CFAA claim thrown out but Breyer ruled that “This Court cannot grant an exception on to the statute (the CFAA) with no basis in the law’s language or this circuit’s interpretive precedent. Accordingly, the Court DENIES 3Taps’ motion. ” (PDF Link).
Orin S. Kerr, a professor of law at the George Washington University, believes Judge Breyer’s decision is the first to directly address the issue that changing IP addresses to get around a block is an unauthorized access in violation of the CFAA. It’s not a decision, he’s happy with.
Kerr wrote, “IP addresses are very easily changed, and most people use the Internet from different IP addresses every day. As a result, attempting to block someone based on an IP address doesn’t ‘block’ them except in a very temporary sense. It pauses them for a few seconds more than actually blocks them. ”
Another legal expert, who doesn’t wish to be named, doesn’t see this decision having any broad effect. He summarized the decision as “The defendant moves to dismiss a CFAA complaint because the operator of a publicly-available Website cannot, it says, ban any particular user and use CFAA to enforce the ban. The court says it can’t dismiss the complaint on that ground, because there’s no support for the claimed immunity in the specific wording of the statute. The court says it isn’t criminalizing widespread conduct, because the question involved (whether CFAA liability can attach for accessing websites one has been specifically banned from) doesn’t involve those ordinary forms of cloaking, ” such as proxies, VPNs, or Tor.
In short, this is a decision applying only to a narrow, specific circumstance.
Hanni M. Fakhoury, staff attorney for the EFF, disagrees with the decision, “The court held that since everyone is ‘authorized’ to access a publicly accessible website under the CFAA, a party (here Craigslist) has to prove that this authorization was somehow revoked. In this case, the court said Craigslist’s act of blocking 3Taps IP address and the cease and desist letter were enough to ‘revoke’ the authorization. We disagree that IP address blocking is a sufficient type of technological circumvention to prove ‘access with authorization’ under the CFAA since (1) its common and easy to mask your IP address; and (2) there are legitimate reasons to do so. ”
But could this decision affect you and your use of such IP masking technologies? Fakhoury replied, “As to whether it would impact other technologies like Tor, etc., the decision doesn’t criminalize those steps in isolation. The opinion only says that if you use one of these techniques to work around the revocation of your access, there’s a CFAA claim. ” So, while not a correct decision, it’s still rather narrow in its potential application.
Related Stories:
CNET: Court rules that IP cloaking to access blocked sites violates law
CNET: 3Taps countersues Craigslist, alleges unfair ‘monopoly’
CNET: Craigslist sues PadMapper for ‘mass harvesting’ listings
No more adult services on Craigslist: 1st Amendment issue or business decision?
How did Craigslist manage to become the king of classifieds?
does google block access based on location/IP address? Can t use …
does google block access based on location/IP address? Can t use drive and voice. issue:google voice loads the framework but no content. just an endless loading drive shows first level, but then cannot open folders or files. when selecting shared with me. google claims i am offline. location testing:upon turning on a vpn and changing my ip address google drive and google voice work turning off the vpn google voice and drive return to their restrictive/broken owser testing:all browsers tried to same effect, all browsers removed and reinstalled to same ion: does google restrict based on IP? why do i need to use a vpn to access googleother notes: i had vacation to china last month where china has google blocked. i had to use a vpn there to access my google drive and to use google search. Latest Update Latest Updates (0) Recommended Answer Recommended Answers (0) Relevant Answer Relevant Answers (0) Our automated system analyzes the replies to choose the one that’s most likely to answer the question. This question is locked and replying has been disabled. Failed to attach file, click here to try linkText to display:Link to: Notifications are currently off and you won’t receive updates. To turn them on, go to Notifications preferences on your Profile page. Discard post? You will lose what you have written so far. Personal information found We found the following personal information in your message: This information will be visible to anyone who visits or subscribes to notifications for this post. Are you sure you want to continue? This will remove the reply from the Answers section. Notifications are off Your notifications are currently off and you won’t receive subscription updates. To turn them on, go to Notifications preferences on your Profile page. Google user This reply is no longer available. Badges Some community members might have badges that indicate their identity or level of participation in a community.
Google Employee — Google product team members and community managers
Community Specialist — Google partners who help ensure the quality of community content
Diamond Product Expert — Community members with product mastery who help other Google users and Product Experts
Platinum Product Expert — Community members with advanced product knowledge who help other Google users and Product Experts
Gold Product Expert — Community members with in-depth product knowledge who help other Google users by answering questions
Silver Product Expert — Community members with intermediate product knowledge who help other Google users by answering questions
Product Expert Alumni — Former Product Experts who are no longer members of the program
Community content may not be verified or up-to-date.
Frequently Asked Questions about youtube ip ban
Can YouTube ban an IP address?
Acceptable Uses of YouTube IP Addresses If you can’t access https://www.youtube.com/, your web host may prevent you from accessing it. … For sites like YouTube, it can be difficult to ban individual users with the public IP address, because most Internet providers dynamically assign these IP addresses to customers.Sep 24, 2021
Is IP banning illegal?
Some have taken this decision to mean that the court’s broad interpretation of the law may mean accessing Websites that are accessible only to some users by proxy servers , virtual private networks (VPN)s, or Tor may be illegal. …Aug 21, 2013
Does Google ban your IP?
No, Google would not be blocking IP addresses. Although the use of a VPN makes it appear that your IP is being blocked, using a VPN does not just hide your IP address. It also wraps all your network packets in an encrypted packet and in so doing, no ISP or firewall/router filters can interfere.Aug 9, 2019
